Please help support the mission of New Advent and get the full contents of this website as an instant download. Includes the Catholic Encyclopedia, Church Fathers, Summa, Bible and more all for only $19.99...
In his treatise, Concerning Perfection according to the Saviour, he writes,
Consent indeed fits for prayer, but fellowship in corruption weakens supplication. At any rate, by the permission he certainly, though delicately, forbids; for while he permits them to return to the same on account of Satan and incontinence, he exhibits a man who will attempt to serve two masters — God by the 'consent' 1 Corinthians 7:5, but by want of consent, incontinence, fornication, and the devil.— Clem. Alex.: Strom., iii. c. 12.
A certain person inveighs against generation, calling it corruptible and destructive; and some one does violence [to Scripture], applying to pro-creation the Saviour's words,
Lay not up treasure on earth, where moth and rust corrupt; and he is not ashamed to add to these the words of the prophet:
You all shall grow old as a garment, and the moth shall devour you.
And, in like manner, they adduce the saying concerning the resurrection of the dead,
The sons of that world neither marry nor are given in marriage. — Clem. Alex.: iii. c. 12, § 86.
Tatian, who maintaining the imaginary flesh of Christ, pronounces all sexual connection impure, who was also the very violent heresiarch of the Encratites, employs an argument of this sort:
If any one sows to the flesh, of the flesh he shall reap corruption; but he sows to the flesh who is joined to a woman; therefore he who takes a wife and sows in the flesh, of the flesh he shall reap corruption.— Hieron .: Com. in Ep. ad Gal.
Seceding from the Church, and being elated and puffed up by a conceit of his teacher, as if he were superior to the rest, he formed his own peculiar type of doctrine. Imagining certain invisible Æons like those of Valentinus, and denouncing marriage as defilement and fornication in the same way as Marcion and Saturninus, and denying the salvation of Adam as an opinion of his own.— Irenæus: Adv. Hœr., i. 28.
He said that there are punishments for blasphemies, foolish talking, and licentious words, which are punished and chastised by the Logos. And he said that women were punished on account of their hair and ornaments by a power placed over those things, which also gave strength to Samson by his hair, and punishes those who by the ornament of their hair are urged on to fornication.— Clem. Alex.: Frag.
But Tatian, not understanding that the expression
Let there be is not always precative but sometimes imperative, most impiously imagined concerning God, who said
Let there be light, that He prayed rather than commanded light to be, as if, as he impiously thought, God was in darkness.— Origen: De Orat.
Tatian separates the old man and the new, but not, as we say, understanding the old man to be the law, and the new man to be the Gospel. We agree with him in saying the same thing, but not in the sense he wishes, abrogating the law as if it belonged to another God. — Clem. Alex.: Strom., iii. 12.
But you gave the Nazarites wine to drink, and commanded the prophets, saying, Prophesy not. On this, perhaps, Tatian the chief of the Encratites endeavours to build his heresy, asserting that wine is not to be drunk, since it was commanded in the law that the Nazarites were not to drink wine, and now those who give the Nazarites wine are accused by the prophet.— Hieron.: Com. in Amos.
Tatian, the patriarch of the Encratites, who himself rejected some of Paul's Epistles, believed this especially, that is [addressed] to Titus, ought to be declared to be the apostle's, thinking little of the assertion of Marcion and others, who agree with him on this point.— Hieron.: Præf. in Com. ad Tit.
[Archelaus (a.d. 280), Bishop of Carrha in Mesopotamia, classes his countryman Tatian with
Marcion, Sabellius, and others who have made up for themselves a peculiar science, i.e., a theology of their own.— Routh: Reliquiæ, tom. v. p. 137. But see Edinburgh Series of this work, vol. xx. p. 267.]
Source. Translated by J.E. Ryland. From Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. 2. Edited by Alexander Roberts, James Donaldson, and A. Cleveland Coxe. (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1885.) Revised and edited for New Advent by Kevin Knight. <http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0203.htm>.
Contact information. The editor of New Advent is Kevin Knight. My email address is feedback732 at newadvent.org. (To help fight spam, this address might change occasionally.) Regrettably, I can't reply to every letter, but I greatly appreciate your feedback — especially notifications about typographical errors and inappropriate ads.